IHC adjourns hearing against ex-NAB chief
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) Friday adjourned hearing till January 27 on petitions against the summoning of former chairman NAB Justice (retd) Javed Iqbal by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and recommendations for his removal as the head of the Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances (CoIED). Chief Justice Aamer Farooq heard the petition of former chairman NAB and director general challenging the PAC’s powers in Tayyaba Gul harassment case.
The court also extended its stay against the recommendations about the removal of Javed Iqbal as the chairman CoIED. Additional attorney general prayed the court to grant more time for case preparations. He said the basic question was that if the PAC had the jurisdiction to summon Javed Iqbal. The attorney general for Pakistan was also served a notice to assist the bench in the case. The court adjourned further hearing and sought arguments on the next date.
-
Christopher Nolan Reveals Why He's A Fan Of 'Fast & Furious' Movies -
Ben Affleck Unable To Accept A New Lover Post Jennifer Lopez Divorce As He Still Grieves End Of Bennifer 2.0 -
Why Is Demi Moore Being Called Ozempic Victim? -
Kaley Cuoco Makes Honest Comparison Of 'Big Bang Theory' And 'Charmed' Gigs -
Robert Picardo Shares Surprising Reaction On Returning To The 'Star Trek' Franchise -
AI Feud Deepens As Musk Targets OpenAI Over Safety Concerns -
'Paranoid' Andrew Fears Assassination: 'Panic Is Spiralling' -
Israeli Minister Hits Back At Prince Harry -
Thousands Of Google Accounts Could Be Misused By Hackers: Report -
Prince Harry Ignores Question About Andrew -
Ryan Gosling On What Makes 'Star Wars: Starfighter' Different From Other Franchise Films -
Rumours About 'ambitious' Savannah Guthrie Dismissed -
Aly Michalka Reveals Why She Turned Down Offer To Star In 'Hannah Montana' -
Harry, Meghan Join William, Kate In Distancing Themselves From Beatrice, Eugenie -
'View' Co-host Sara Haines Makes Rare Confession About Married Life -
Andrew Believes King Charles 'sacrificed' Him To Protect Institution?