On April 9, 2005, royal viewers were glued to Windsor as Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles tied the knot in a long-awaited ceremony.
The civil wedding at Windsor Guildhall was attended by several senior royals, including Prince William and Prince Harry.
But one very prominent figure was notably absent-Queen Elizabeth. At the time, her absence sparked widespread speculation. Many believed it was a subtle sign of disapproval toward the union.
However, the real reason was rooted in royal duty and religious tradition rather than personal sentiment. According to Prince Charles' official biographer, Jonathan Dimbleby, the Queen had made her position clear well in advance.
As the Supreme Governor of the Church of England, she chose not to attend the civil ceremony because it went against the traditions associated with her role. 'The Prince would have liked her to be there,' Dimbleby noted, ' but she was absolutely firm in her decision-not out of rejection to the marriage, but out of respect for her constitutional responsibilities.'
Despite skipping the ceremony, the Queen did attend the reception later that day-and made quite an impression. During her speech, she lightened the mood with warmth and humour, winning over the guests and putting to rest any lingering doubts about her support for the couple.
Her presence at the celebration became a defining moment of grace, showing her ability to balance tradition with personal affection.
Meghan sends special gift to British presenter years after her dramatic TV clash
'Doting' dad King Charles III's reported 'greatest sadness' is never getting to know Prince Archie, Princess Lilibet
Gwyneth Paltrow praises the Duchess of Sussex and condemns 'feud clickbait'
Taylor Swift receives death threats and worse in chilling letters sent by her stalker Eric Swarbrick in 2018
Hugh Jackman and Sutton Foster spark romance earlier in January
Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds seemingly engaged in an intense conversation at Time100 Gala