Supreme Court's senior puisne Judge Mansoor Ali Shah has warned of dire consequences of not implementing the apex court's verdicts, saying that it would disturb the balance of the Constitution of Pakistan.
"The SC verdict cannot be disregarded or delayed or else the entire legal system will be disrupted and the balance of Constitution will be out if you seek non-implementation of judgments," he said Saturday while addressing an event in Islamabad.
He said that the "separation of powers is the core component of democracy" which shouldn’t be disturbed.
Implementation of apex court orders is not a burden or a courtesy that has to be done, but a constitutional obligation that needs to be fulfilled, he added.
"This is a delicate equilibrium which needs to be respected. We have an obligation to keep this equilibrium in balance and there shouldn’t be any executive overreach. No one has the choice or the prerogative to second guess if the judgment is right or wrong," the justice said.
He said that only SC had the prerogative to decide a matter and after that the judgment has to be implemented.
There will be severe consequences if the constitutional duty of implementing the SC's orders is not fulfilled, he added.
“I want to underline that Supreme Court’s judgments [always] get implemented and it is the structure of the Constitution," Justice Shah said, stressing that there has never been a case where an apex court verdict was not implemented.
He said that not implementing the SC rulings would be "a violation of the Constitution".
"There is no choice but to comply with the Supreme Court’s orders," he added.
The SC judge further stated that implementation of judgments was the structure of Constitution as the top court draws the authority to decide the matters from the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, instead of any other document
"No one has the choice to call it [SC rulings] 'wrong' or 'not right'. The Constitution says that this is a judgment and it has to be implemented," he said.
Justice Shah went on to say that those who have any objection to the Supreme Court's verdict can change the entire structure of the Constitution "but right now this is how it is".
He said that disregarding the apex court's rulings was also "against the separation of powers".
It may be noted that the ruling parties recently passed the Elections (Second Amendment) Bill, 2024, in parliament which seeks to 'circumvent' the Supreme Court's July 21 ruling that declared Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) a political party and eligible for reserved seats.
The apex court’s full bench on July 21 ruled in favour of the Imran Khan-founded party in the reserved seats case, paving the way for its return to the parliament and effectively depriving the PML-N-led coalition government of its two-thirds majority in the parliament.
Justice Shah had announced the 8-5 majority verdict of the SC full bench, which declared the PTI eligible to receive reserved seats for women and minorities.
Judge Ali Warriach remarks relevant court to resume accused couple's trial besides hearing bail petitions
The chief justice says he was told in a meeting that the tenure of judges would be extended
Aurat Foundation expresses outrage over KP CM's inappropriate language against journalists mainly women
Challenging the decision at the sessions court, lawyer says magistrate ignored crucial evidence in bail plea
Rescue teams shifted injured to District Headquarters Hospital Wana, while one critically injured victim was
PCAA sources say flight G-9512 landed at Jinnah International Airport after permission from air traffic controller