Association as well as member of the Punjab Bar Council.
However, documents reveal that the inquiry against Tariq Anis pertained to the year 1997 when a complaint was made to the then Ehtesab Commissioner for allegation of corruption and corrupt practices and the Chief Ehtesab Commissioner directed the Anti-Corruption Establishment (ACE) Punjab to carry out a probe in the matter. On May 29, 2002, the NAB chairman filed the reference before the special judge, Accountability Court (AC) No. 1 Lahore.
Tariq Anis sought quashment of the reference but the AC dismissed his plea on July 9, 2003. He challenged this order before the Lahore High Court (LHC), which stayed the proceedings at the AC on October 30, 2003. Then, the case lingered for the next ten years with 100 plus adjournments.
The final disposal of his plea was still pending in the LHC when the NRO 2007 was promulgated. However, Tariq Anis moved an application to the AC to take benefit of the NRO, which was accepted and the proceedings against him in the AC were terminated under the amnesty law on April 26, 2008.
At the same time, on May 20, 2008 he withdrew his plea from the LHC after the end of his trial at the AC in which the AC proceedings court had been stayed.
As the NRO was nullified on December 16, 2009, Tariq Anis’s case was also revived and he was summoned to face trial at the AC in the same reference. However, after its revival, he again moved the LHC and sought a stay against proceedings at the Accountability Court that was granted on June 10, 2010. The matter stays it now.
Daniyal Aziz said he has moved an application to the LHC stating that the matter was lingering since 2002 and had not been decided by the AC because of the stay orders issued by the high court.
He prayed that the case should be fixed for hearing and decided on merit as early as possible in the interest of justice, equity and fair play. Daniyal Aziz claimed that neither the NAB authorities were interested to argue the matter for a decision on merits nor Tariq Anis is prepared to come forward to plead. “The purpose of justice will not be served if strong and influential persons sitting in the power corridors were let off and the poor are punished in minor and petty offices, hence, indulgence of the honourable court is required to set the law in motion because everyone should be dealt in accordance with law without fear of favour,” he argued.
However, Tariq Anis said that he was the only one charged under the NAB law who was granted bail before arrest only because of the reference having no basis or ground. In the 2008 elections, he defeated Daniyal Aziz, who contested on the PML-Q ticket, from NA 116 Narowal by bagging 45,097 votes against his rival’s 37,138 votes. PML-N’s Dr Hafiz Shabbir Ahmed bagged 22,369 votes. Daniyal Aziz later challenged Tariq Anis’s election decision which is still pending.