The talks between the government and the PTI may just become a myth. Scheduled for January 28, they appear to be doomed before they begin. National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq, tasked with facilitating these negotiations, has summoned the session but the PTI has refused to attend, creating yet another impasse in a political climate that thrives on stalemates. The government has pointed out that the PTI has not formally called off the talks, leaving room for ambiguity. On the other hand, PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan’s conflicting statements – first declaring the talks cancelled, then saying they were ‘on hold’ – add to the confusion. This lack of clarity, coupled with Prime Minister’s Adviser Rana Sanaullah’s accusation that the PTI is responsible for the breakdown in dialogue, shows yet again the sheer lack of coherence that characterises Pakistan’s political discourse.
From the outset, the PTI has been an unwilling participant in these negotiations. Their reluctance to engage in meaningful dialogue – evident not just in this instance but throughout their political history – suggests a troubling aversion to democratic norms of negotiation and compromise. The PTI’s preference for ultimatums over discussions shows a party that seeks immediate fixes rather than long-term solutions. Their written demands – the release of political prisoners and the formation of a judicial commission to investigate the events of May 9, 2023, and November 26, 2024 – were accompanied by an ultimatum to end the talks if these conditions were not met. This pretty much undermines the very essence of dialogue, which requires patience, flexibility and a willingness to find common ground. The government, for its part, cannot entirely absolve itself of responsibility. While it claims to have been ready to continue the talks, it must reflect on whether it has done enough to address the PTI’s concerns or build an environment conducive to dialogue. The perception that the government has been dragging its feet, possibly to buy time has only fueled the PTI’s scepticism. However, now this decision to abandon the talks preemptively weakens its position. By walking away, it forfeits the opportunity to expose any insincerity on the government’s part.
Let’s face it: the PTI’s disdain for dialogue is not new. Whether in opposition, in power or now back in opposition, the party has consistently preferred to engage with the establishment rather than its political contemporaries. This strategy, while perhaps effective in the short term, is unsustainable in a democratic system where political consensus is essential for governance. The party’s willingness to sit down for talks, probably prompted by the fallout from the November 26 protest and the Al-Qadir Trust verdict, appeared to be a pragmatic shift. The way forward for both sides lies in recognising that dialogue is not a sign of weakness but a cornerstone of democracy. Both sides must move beyond their entrenched positions and engage with sincerity. For the PTI, this means abandoning its preference for ultimatums and unilateral decisions. For the government, it requires addressing the PTI’s concerns in good faith. Political observers are right to caution the PTI against expecting immediate results. Temperatures will not cool overnight. If Pakistan is to navigate its current crises, it must do so through dialogue.