Defending democracy
The true ‘arsenal of democracy’ is not a nuclear navy nor a Hellfire missile rain of death from the skyIn our wonderful land of America we have ongoing debates, discussions, and principled differences. To the extent those are happening by citizens focused on the issues and not on character assassination
By our correspondents
July 30, 2015
The true ‘arsenal of democracy’ is not a nuclear navy nor a Hellfire missile rain of death from the sky
In our wonderful land of America we have ongoing debates, discussions, and principled differences. To the extent those are happening by citizens focused on the issues and not on character assassination or violent threat, those robust modes of discourse are the heart of a healthy democracy.
Our democracy is increasingly unhealthy. And we are degrading the image and desirability of democracy around the world as a result. This is a reversal of a century-long trend around the world of more democracy that peaked in the 1990s. Autocrats are not only making a comeback, they are doing so with more populist support.
From the racist frontrunner candidacy of Donald Trump to the atavistic emergence of a caliphate in the Middle East, we see a rollback of engaged, respectful, vigorous citizen participants in politics. Where there is a resurgence of focus on civil society participation, however, we see signs of hope, such as pockets of social activism in West Africa that focus on the lessons from Martin Luther King and the US civil rights movement, or a consortium of Palestinians struggling to transform their liberation struggle to democracy-friendly nonviolence.
Rightwing politicos declaim on American exceptionalism; they name the USA as the one nation that offers the best hope for humankind. Sadly, they then practice the ‘might makes right’ model of imposed democracy – an oxymoronic enterprise indeed.
Democracy cannot be installed at gunpoint any more than love can, or empathy, or altruism – all of which drive more and better democracy, while guns and bombs – Francis Scott Key notwithstanding – erode it. Metrics of democracy – citizen participation, inclusion, minority rights, transparency, nonviolent transition of power – are all best promoted and practiced without death threats.
Citizen engagement is at the heart of the free press – the very paper you hold or are reading online is the pulse of a democracy worthy of the name. When you engage – read it, write a letter, share it with others – and do so in a way that maintains healthy respect alongside healthy debate, you are bolstering our democracy and showing the rest of the world a better model that they will emulate.
The true ‘arsenal of democracy’ is not a nuclear navy nor a Hellfire missile rain of death from the sky. It is you, seeking information, sharing your thoughts, caring for the hearts and minds of your neighbours, even the ones with whom you disagree – especially the ones who anger you with an opinion you find objectionable.
I teach several courses that revolve around these concepts and I love watching students evolve from apathy and fatalism to outrage and violent ideation to care, capacity, and human agency. True, some never move off the cynical dime, some get stuck on pugnacity and demonisation, but those who pass into the stages of engagement and rational, careful analysis and discourse are the ones I am confident will do the most good for democracy in our land, and, by extension of this evolving American experiment, the rest of the world.
Courtesy: Counterpunch.org
In our wonderful land of America we have ongoing debates, discussions, and principled differences. To the extent those are happening by citizens focused on the issues and not on character assassination or violent threat, those robust modes of discourse are the heart of a healthy democracy.
Our democracy is increasingly unhealthy. And we are degrading the image and desirability of democracy around the world as a result. This is a reversal of a century-long trend around the world of more democracy that peaked in the 1990s. Autocrats are not only making a comeback, they are doing so with more populist support.
From the racist frontrunner candidacy of Donald Trump to the atavistic emergence of a caliphate in the Middle East, we see a rollback of engaged, respectful, vigorous citizen participants in politics. Where there is a resurgence of focus on civil society participation, however, we see signs of hope, such as pockets of social activism in West Africa that focus on the lessons from Martin Luther King and the US civil rights movement, or a consortium of Palestinians struggling to transform their liberation struggle to democracy-friendly nonviolence.
Rightwing politicos declaim on American exceptionalism; they name the USA as the one nation that offers the best hope for humankind. Sadly, they then practice the ‘might makes right’ model of imposed democracy – an oxymoronic enterprise indeed.
Democracy cannot be installed at gunpoint any more than love can, or empathy, or altruism – all of which drive more and better democracy, while guns and bombs – Francis Scott Key notwithstanding – erode it. Metrics of democracy – citizen participation, inclusion, minority rights, transparency, nonviolent transition of power – are all best promoted and practiced without death threats.
Citizen engagement is at the heart of the free press – the very paper you hold or are reading online is the pulse of a democracy worthy of the name. When you engage – read it, write a letter, share it with others – and do so in a way that maintains healthy respect alongside healthy debate, you are bolstering our democracy and showing the rest of the world a better model that they will emulate.
The true ‘arsenal of democracy’ is not a nuclear navy nor a Hellfire missile rain of death from the sky. It is you, seeking information, sharing your thoughts, caring for the hearts and minds of your neighbours, even the ones with whom you disagree – especially the ones who anger you with an opinion you find objectionable.
I teach several courses that revolve around these concepts and I love watching students evolve from apathy and fatalism to outrage and violent ideation to care, capacity, and human agency. True, some never move off the cynical dime, some get stuck on pugnacity and demonisation, but those who pass into the stages of engagement and rational, careful analysis and discourse are the ones I am confident will do the most good for democracy in our land, and, by extension of this evolving American experiment, the rest of the world.
Courtesy: Counterpunch.org
-
Meghan Markle Shows ‘real Pain’ With Her Body Language In Jordan -
Jennifer Garner Names Her Movie That She Hasn't Seen In Full Since Its Premiere -
Bridgerton’s Michelle Mao On Facing Backlash As Season Four Antagonist -
King Charles Gets New ‘secret Weapon’ After Andrew Messes Up -
Shia LaBeouf Makes Bold Claim About Homosexuals In First Interview After Mardi Gras Arrest -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie ‘strained’ As They Are ‘not Turning Back’ On Andrew -
Benny Blanco Addresses ‘dirty Feet’ Backlash After Podcast Moment Sparks Online Frenzy -
Sarah Ferguson Unusual Trait That Confused Royal Expert -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Left Sarah Ferguson Feeling 'worthless' -
Ben Affleck Focused On 'real Prize,' Stability After Jennifer Garner Speaks About Co Parenting Mechanics -
Luke Grimes Reveals Hilarious Reason His Baby Can't Stop Laughing At Him -
Why Kate Middleton, Prince William Opt For ‘show Stopping Style’ -
Here's Why Leonardo DiCaprio Will Not Attend This Year's 'Actors Award' Despite Major Nomination -
Ethan Hawke Reflects On Hollywood Success As Fifth Oscar Nomination Arrives -
Tom Cruise Feeling Down In The Dumps Post A Series Of Failed Romances: Report -
'The Pitt' Producer Reveals Why He Was Nervous For The New Ep Of Season Two