country’s internal and external policies if elected to power. And the nation responded to his call in the May 11elections and brought him to power. The people elected him with a heavy majority so that his party could form a government on its own, without the aid of any other party, and implement any policy he wanted, unfettered by the wishes of any coalition partners.
The people have waited patiently, along with him, for six months for the change to begin. Now that the path has been smoothed for the implementation of policies that he wants to introduce it would only be appropriate if he unveils the contours of that policy of change with regard to the situation at home as well as abroad, particularly in our relations with India and Afghanistan.
The Afghan situation is becoming more and more complicated with each passing day. President Karzai is unwilling to sign the widely talked about bilateral security agreement with the US whereas the US wants it to be signed in a matter of days, before the end of the year. The US is getting impatient with Karzai’s delaying tactics and is threatening a ‘zero option’ if the agreement is not signed as desired by Washington.
Whether the agreement is signed or not the situation will become more dicey, even with the likelihood of another civil war after the pullout of US forces. This will have serious repercussions for Pakistan. To cater to that the prime minister has to set the course of our policy right. Just visits to Afghanistan will not bring about positive results. We have to discard once and for all our outmoded notion of having ‘strategic depth’ in Afghanistan, a policy that has backfired badly and caused us immense problems apart from creating hatred for Pakistan in the minds of many Afghans.
Prime Minister Nawaz also has to bear in mind the fast changing developments that are taking place in the region. The US has moved from its decades-old position of animosity towards Iran and is moving fast on the newly found track of accommodation with that country, even at the cost of causing apprehension among its old allies like Israel, the Saudis and others in the Middle East. Who knows what other adjustments we will have to make in our foreign policy because of the shifting sands.
While on the one hand the change may help us complete the long awaited gas pipeline project with Iran, on the other it will reduce the importance of depending on Pakistan for transportation of goods from Afghanistan because of easier access to the Iranian port of Chabahar. The US can now avail of the Iranian port facilities for this purpose in case Pakistan makes the present route too problematic.
We should also not forget that President Obama has proclaimed loud and clear that his forces will target Al-Qaeda members wherever they are found. And I believe this message was repeated in different words during our prime minister’s meeting with him in Washington when the question of drone attacks was raised. Most probably it was emphasised that the root cause for which drones operate over Pakistani territory should be removed by Pakistani forces themselves, otherwise drones would continue addressing the problem.
The new army chief – whose hands are clean, having nothing to do with the deals made by his predecessors – is in a better position to reconsider the GHQ's policy towards Fata since it cannot be kept separate from the policy towards Afghanistan. The two are closely linked in every respect. The people there have been treated very poorly despite the fact that they have rendered tremendous sacrifices for the country. Instead of appreciating that and doing something for the development of that area they are looked down upon and treated as potential enemies.
This attitude has to change and that change can be brought by no one other than the army chief himself. He needs to introduce a culture of friendship with the people there – by directing his troops to facilitate their lives instead of making them more difficult as has been the case for the last ten years. He must put an end to the step-motherly treatment meted to the people there.
Nobody there supports militancy. On the contrary they are sick and tired of the situation in their region, which has made life hell for them. They want to live in peace like others elsewhere in the country. What is happening there is not of their making. They had no contribution in it. They have been forced to become silent spectators even to the killing of their near and dear ones as those holding the killing machines have the solid support of hidden hands. And it is not possible for them (tribesmen) to match that.
They need all help and assistance that the armed forces, which are calling the shots in the area, can extend to ensure their protection. The people of Fata are waiting for a positive signal from the government. Once they get the signal they will come in the open in support of the army for any positive changes in that area.
The writer is a former ambassador. Email: waziruk@hotmail.com
Going by BJP’s narrative, rapid economic progress was made possible under Modi's leadership if not ‘Modi's...
Pakistan was considered water-abundant country, with per capita water availability being 5650 cubic meters in 1951
Compounding this issue are inefficient canal systems, outdated infrastructure, and widespread water theft
Please note that dam survey team from World Bank had proposed building of this dam in 1955
Cuts in public sector development spending programme are also likely to further affect quality of essential services
Barriers and hurdles created by Trump's tariff policy have potential to disrupt smooth supply chain of trade and...