will have to show that they are serious for this partnership.”
Sir Bruce said it’s not the wealthy in Pakistan who are cheaters. Equally, he said, Britain’s elite as well as rich people everywhere else in the world try to hide their wealth and dodge paying taxes but what’s happening in Pakistan is beyond any comparison. “We have a heated debate in this country about this social contract as who pays less or more. Some rich people do avoid paying taxes but we come down on them like a ton of bricks but the vast majority of our people pay taxes and they don’t find it easy to avoid.”
He said Pakistan’s wealthy class don’t seem to have any respect for the concept of social contract and justice. He said Britain has partners in the federal and provincial governments who recognise that teachers can be appointed on merit, that there should be schools and kids should study there. He said it was a good sign but stakeholders of all persuasions should recognise there needs to be partnership and every side needs to do more develop the social contract and responsibility.
He hoped that the next democratically elected government will recognise that reform is necessary in Pakistan “but how this reform is carried out is for Pakistan and not for Britain, nor do we wish to impose it”.
“We do want to see some of the outcomes and that clamping down on corruption and people should know where corruption is taking place, who is doing it and the culprits should be brought to justice.
“There are tens of millions of people in Pakistan who are looking to improve their conditions and politicians should realise this. That’s absolutely essential if they are going to have the trust of their people. The new government has the opportunity to reform.”
Sir Bruce said he had not seen any evidence or link that British aid money was being used in election campaign in Pakistan through Benazir Income Support Programme. He suggested that Pakistan should pursue projects which build institutions and are not centred on personalities and the system should continue even if the name changes or there is a new set-up in place.
Meanwhile, Britain’s media focused on the House of Commons’ International Development Committee’s report on Pakistan and ridiculed Pakistan’s ruling class. ‘ The Time’ said in a damning editorial that barley one in every 40 of the about 10 million judged to earn enough to be liable for income tax paid any taxes at all.
“This is hardly surprising, considering that in 2011 one of the many wealthy men who did not file a tax return was President, Asif Ali Zardari. Full three quarters of the members of the National Assembly also neglected to file a return”.
The editorial continued: “The authorities in Islamabad are making no serious efforts to collect taxes. They are free riding on the generosity of the people of other nations. The purpose of the development is to help a struggling nation. It is not a substitute for a nation not helping itself.”
Salman Akram said that Imran wishes for public to be made aware of prevailing “lawlessness”
CM cautions that any hostile move by India under guise of this event would incur a heavy price
Yousafzai urged the apex court to set aside IHC ruling, arguing that it is contrary to facts on record
Rabbani strongly condemns India’s allegations of Pakistan’s involvement in Pahalgam incident without providing any...
“Now, India is targeting Pakistan through hydrological warfare,” says CM
Three judges from Sindh, Balochistan, and Lahore High Courts were transferred to IHC, drawing severe criticism